↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Barriers and facilitators to implementation of non-medical independent prescribing in primary care in the UK: a qualitative systematic review
Published in
BMJ Open, June 2022
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Student > Master 9 6%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 101 65%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 5%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 101 65%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2025.
All research outputs
#1,792,568
of 33,150,263 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,986
of 29,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,939
of 467,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#56
of 929 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,150,263 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29,336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 467,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 929 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.