↓ Skip to main content

Snake fungal disease: an emerging threat to wild snakes

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
39 X users
facebook
11 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
304 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Snake fungal disease: an emerging threat to wild snakes
Published in
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, December 2016
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2015.0457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey M. Lorch, Susan Knowles, Julia S. Lankton, Kathy Michell, Jaime L. Edwards, Joshua M. Kapfer, Richard A. Staffen, Erik R. Wild, Katie Z. Schmidt, Anne E. Ballmann, Doug Blodgett, Terence M. Farrell, Brad M. Glorioso, Lisa A. Last, Steven J. Price, Krysten L. Schuler, Christopher E. Smith, James F. X. Wellehan, David S. Blehert

Abstract

Since 2006, there has been a marked increase in the number of reports of severe and often fatal fungal skin infections in wild snakes in the eastern USA. The emerging condition, referred to as snake fungal disease (SFD), was initially documented in rattlesnakes, where the infections were believed to pose a risk to the viability of affected populations. The disease is caused by Ophidiomyces ophiodiicola, a fungus recently split from a complex of fungi long referred to as the Chrysosporium anamorph of Nannizziopsis vriesii (CANV). Here we review the current state of knowledge about O. ophiodiicola and SFD. In addition, we provide original findings which demonstrate that O. ophiodiicola is widely distributed in eastern North America, has a broad host range, is the predominant cause of fungal skin infections in wild snakes and often causes mild infections in snakes emerging from hibernation. This new information, together with what is already available in the scientific literature, advances our knowledge of the cause, pathogenesis and ecology of SFD. However, additional research is necessary to elucidate the factors driving the emergence of this disease and develop strategies to mitigate its impacts.This article is part of the themed issue 'Tackling emerging fungal threats to animal health, food security and ecosystem resilience'.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 304 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Unknown 299 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Bachelor 42 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 42 14%
Unknown 70 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 41%
Environmental Science 39 13%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 26 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 2%
Other 14 5%
Unknown 76 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#443,225
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#357
of 7,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,919
of 418,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#5
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.