↓ Skip to main content

Shortcomings of the normalized difference vegetation index as an exposure metric

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Plants, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Shortcomings of the normalized difference vegetation index as an exposure metric
Published in
Nature Plants, June 2022
DOI 10.1038/s41477-022-01170-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Professor 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Researcher 2 5%
Other 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 28 64%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 5 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Mathematics 1 2%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 28 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#8,546,835
of 32,628,470 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#1,826
of 2,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,861
of 460,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#41
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,628,470 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 43.8. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.