You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A framework for ensemble modelling of climate change impacts on lakes worldwide: the ISIMIP Lake Sector
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geoscientific Model Development, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.5194/gmd-15-4597-2022 |
| Authors |
Malgorzata Golub, Wim Thiery, Rafael Marcé, Don Pierson, Inne Vanderkelen, Daniel Mercado-Bettin, R. Iestyn Woolway, Luke Grant, Eleanor Jennings, Benjamin M. Kraemer, Jacob Schewe, Fang Zhao, Katja Frieler, Matthias Mengel, Vasiliy Y. Bogomolov, Damien Bouffard, Marianne Côté, Raoul-Marie Couture, Andrey V. Debolskiy, Bram Droppers, Gideon Gal, Mingyang Guo, Annette B. G. Janssen, Georgiy Kirillin, Robert Ladwig, Madeline Magee, Tadhg Moore, Marjorie Perroud, Sebastiano Piccolroaz, Love Raaman Vinnaa, Martin Schmid, Tom Shatwell, Victor M. Stepanenko, Zeli Tan, Bronwyn Woodward, Huaxia Yao, Rita Adrian, Mathew Allan, Orlane Anneville, Lauri Arvola, Karen Atkins, Leon Boegman, Cayelan Carey, Kyle Christianson, Elvira de Eyto, Curtis DeGasperi, Maria Grechushnikova, Josef Hejzlar, Klaus Joehnk, Ian D. Jones, Alo Laas, Eleanor B. Mackay, Ivan Mammarella, Hampus Markensten, Chris McBride, Deniz Özkundakci, Miguel Potes, Karsten Rinke, Dale Robertson, James A. Rusak, Rui Salgado, Leon van der Linden, Piet Verburg, Danielle Wain, Nicole K. Ward, Sabine Wollrab, Galina Zdorovennova |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Belgium | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 21% |
| Unknown | 3 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 28% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 16% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#2,821,882
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Geoscientific Model Development
#142
of 2,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,314
of 433,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoscientific Model Development
#7
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,676 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.