↓ Skip to main content

労働者アイヒマン ハンナ・アーレント『イェルサレムのアイヒマン』再考

Overview of attention for article published in The Annual of the Society of Economic Sociology, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
労働者アイヒマン ハンナ・アーレント『イェルサレムのアイヒマン』再考
Published in
The Annual of the Society of Economic Sociology, April 2021
DOI 10.15081/soes.40.0_68
Authors

百木 漠

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,297,846
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from The Annual of the Society of Economic Sociology
#2
of 9 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,359
of 453,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annual of the Society of Economic Sociology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 7 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them