↓ Skip to main content

Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: Update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment Programme

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: Update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment Programme'
Overall attention for this book
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
20 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
245 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Models and applications for measuring the impact of health research: Update of a systematic review for the Health Technology Assessment Programme
Published by
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., October 2016
DOI 10.3310/hta20760
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 245 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 15%
Researcher 35 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 7%
Student > Bachelor 16 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 6%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 82 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 11%
Social Sciences 22 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 11 4%
Other 49 20%
Unknown 84 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,767,635
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#146
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,180
of 337,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.