↓ Skip to main content

「発話困難な重度身体障がい者」の論文執筆過程の実態 ――思考主体の切り分け難さと能力の普遍性をめぐる考察――

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 671)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
「発話困難な重度身体障がい者」の論文執筆過程の実態 ――思考主体の切り分け難さと能力の普遍性をめぐる考察――
Published in
Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron, January 2020
DOI 10.4057/jsr.71.447
Authors

天畠 大輔

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#4,822,884
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#49
of 671 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,497
of 480,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Sociological Review / Shakaigaku Hyoron
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 671 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 480,143 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.