↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Genetic loci and prioritization of genes for kidney function decline derived from a meta-analysis of 62 longitudinal genome-wide association studies
Published in
Kidney International, June 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.kint.2022.05.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathias Gorski, Humaira Rasheed, Alexander Teumer, Laurent F. Thomas, Sarah E. Graham, Gardar Sveinbjornsson, Thomas W. Winkler, Felix Günther, Klaus J. Stark, Jin-Fang Chai, Bamidele O. Tayo, Matthias Wuttke, Yong Li, Adrienne Tin, Tarunveer S. Ahluwalia, Johan Ärnlöv, Bjørn Olav Åsvold, Stephan J. L. Bakker, Bernhard Banas, Nisha Bansal, Mary L. Biggs, Ginevra Biino, Michael Böhnke, Eric Boerwinkle, Erwin P. Bottinger, Hermann Brenner, Ben Brumpton, Robert J. Carroll, Layal Chaker, John Chalmers, Miao-Li Chee, Miao-Ling Chee, Ching-Yu Cheng, Audrey Y. Chu, Marina Ciullo, Massimiliano Cocca, James P. Cook, Josef Coresh, Daniele Cusi, Martin H. de Borst, Frauke Degenhardt, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Karlhans Endlich, Michele K. Evans, Mary F Feitosa, Andre Franke, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Christian Fuchsberger, Piyush Gampawar, Ron T. Gansevoort, Mohsen Ghanbari, Sahar Ghasemi, Vilmantas Giedraitis, Christian Gieger, Daniel F Gudbjartsson, Stein Hallan, Pavel Hamet, Asahi Hishida, Kevin Ho, Edith Hofer, Bernd Holleczek, Hilma Holm, Anselm Hoppmann, Katrin Horn, Nina Hutri-Kähönen, Kristian Hveem, Shih-Jen Hwang, M. Arfan Ikram, Navya Shilpa Josyula, Bettina Jung, Mika Kähönen, Irma Karabegović, Chiea-Chuen Khor, Wolfgang Koenig, Holly Kramer, Bernhard K. Krämer, Brigitte Kühnel, Johanna Kuusisto, Markku Laakso, Leslie A. Lange, Terho Lehtimäki, Man Li, Wolfgang Lieb, Lifelines cohort study, Lars Lind, Cecilia M. Lindgren, Ruth J. F. Loos, Mary Ann Lukas, Leo-Pekka Lyytikäinen, Anubha Mahajan, Pamela R. Matias-Garcia, Christa Meisinger, Thomas Meitinger, Olle Melander, Yuri Milaneschi, Pashupati P. Mishra, Nina Mononen, Andrew P. Morris, Josyf C. Mychaleckyj, Girish N. Nadkarni, Mariko Naito, Masahiro Nakatochi, Mike A. Nalls, Matthias Nauck, Kjell Nikus, Boting Ning, Ilja M. Nolte, Teresa Nutile, Michelle L. O’Donoghue, Jeffrey O’Connell, Isleifur Olafsson, Marju Orho-Melander, Afshin Parsa, Sarah A. Pendergrass, Brenda W. J. H. Penninx, Mario Pirastu, Michael H. Preuss, Bruce M. Psaty, Laura M. Raffield, Olli T. Raitakari, Myriam Rheinberger, Kenneth M. Rice, Federica Rizzi, Alexander R. Rosenkranz, Peter Rossing, Jerome I. Rotter, Daniela Ruggiero, Kathleen A. Ryan, Charumathi Sabanayagam, Erika Salvi, Helena Schmidt, Reinhold Schmidt, Markus Scholz, Ben Schöttker, Christina-Alexandra Schulz, Sanaz Sedaghat, Christian M. Shaffer, Karsten B. Sieber, Xueling Sim, Mario Sims, Harold Snieder, Kira J. Stanzick, Unnur Thorsteinsdottir, Hannah Stocker, Konstantin Strauch, Heather M. Stringham, Patrick Sulem, Silke Szymczak, Kent D. Taylor, Chris H. L. Thio, Johanne Tremblay, Simona Vaccargiu, Pim van der Harst, Peter J. van der Most, Niek Verweij, Uwe Völker, Kenji Wakai, Melanie Waldenberger, Lars Wallentin, Stefan Wallner, Judy Wang, Dawn M. Waterworth, Harvey D. White, Cristen J. Willer, Tien-Yin Wong, Mark Woodward, Qiong Yang, Laura M. Yerges-Armstrong, Martina Zimmermann, Alan B. Zonderman, Tobias Bergler, Kari Stefansson, Carsten A. Böger, Cristian Pattaro, Anna Köttgen, Florian Kronenberg, Iris M. Heid

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 6%
Other 3 3%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 3%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 69 63%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 4%
Engineering 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 69 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#4,827,719
of 32,823,226 outputs
Outputs from Kidney International
#2,332
of 9,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,783
of 447,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kidney International
#30
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,823,226 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,719 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.