↓ Skip to main content

乳幼児における乳び胸の評価

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Japanese Society of Pediatric Radiology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
乳幼児における乳び胸の評価
Published in
Journal of Japanese Society of Pediatric Radiology, October 2021
DOI 10.20844/jspr.37.2_147
Authors

巷岡 祐子, 河野 達夫, 近藤 睦子, 野崎 太希, 榎園 美香子, 槙殿 文香理, 下島 直樹, 下高原 昭廣

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Japanese Society of Pediatric Radiology
#18
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#269,321
of 445,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Japanese Society of Pediatric Radiology
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one scored the same or higher as 15 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.