↓ Skip to main content

Management and environmental factors associated with simulated restoration seeding barriers in sagebrush steppe

Overview of attention for article published in Restoration Ecology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Management and environmental factors associated with simulated restoration seeding barriers in sagebrush steppe
Published in
Restoration Ecology, June 2022
DOI 10.1111/rec.13722
Authors

Stella M. Copeland, John B. Bradford, Stuart P. Hardegree, Daniel R. Schlaepfer, Kevin J. Badik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,574,814
of 23,006,268 outputs
Outputs from Restoration Ecology
#1,380
of 1,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#310,659
of 439,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Restoration Ecology
#26
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,006,268 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,563 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.