↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
136 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
32 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
6 YouTube creators

Readers on

mendeley
412 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Olive (Olea europaea L.) Leaf Polyphenols Improve Insulin Sensitivity in Middle-Aged Overweight Men: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0057622
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Olive plant leaves (Olea europaea L.) have been used for centuries in folk medicine to treat diabetes, but there are very limited data examining the effects of olive polyphenols on glucose homeostasis in humans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 412 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 403 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 14%
Researcher 56 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 9%
Other 26 6%
Other 70 17%
Unknown 127 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 40 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 22 5%
Other 58 14%
Unknown 151 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2024.
All research outputs
#275,430
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#3,761
of 225,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,454
of 244,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#68
of 5,788 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,788 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.