You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Belt and Road Initiative in Southeast Asia: A Mixed Methods Examination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Contemporary China, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1080/10670564.2022.2090099 |
| Authors |
Angela Tritto, Alvin Camba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Researcher | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 17% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#3,649,359
of 25,657,205 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Contemporary China
#184
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,811
of 445,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Contemporary China
#6
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,657,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.