↓ Skip to main content

Do Premature Female Infants Really Do Better Than Their Male Counterparts?

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Perinatology, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Do Premature Female Infants Really Do Better Than Their Male Counterparts?
Published in
American Journal of Perinatology, November 2010
DOI 10.1055/s-0030-1268239
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We compared survival and outcomes in process of care in female versus male infants born ≤32 weeks gestational age (GA). Data were obtained from the Alere database for infants born ≤32 weeks GA. Females were compared with males for demographics, complications, and care processes. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted using chi-square analysis, analysis of variance, or logistic regression. Of the infants included, 6086 female and 6721 males were included. Mean GA did not differ, males were born larger than females, and females were more likely to be born SGA. Males received more surfactant, developed more CLD, received more steroids, and more often required oxygen at discharge. Females were more likely to develop a patent ductus arteriosus. After controlling for body weight, GA, and small-for-GA status, females were more likely to survive (95.4% versus 93.6%, odds ratio 1.63, P < 0.01). Male sex did not play a role in other processes of care except for weaning to a crib. Male infants born ≤32 weeks GA have a decreased rate of survival and an increased rate of respiratory morbidity in spite of higher birth weight distributions. Sex did not play a role in other processes of care.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 39 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 13%
Student > Master 5 13%
Researcher 5 13%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2026.
All research outputs
#2,662,536
of 34,567,073 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Perinatology
#136
of 3,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,042
of 156,188 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Perinatology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,567,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,188 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them