You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mercury contamination and potential health risks to Arctic seabirds and shorebirds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156944 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivier Chastel, Jérôme Fort, Joshua T Ackerman, Céline Albert, Frédéric Angelier, Niladri Basu, Pierre Blévin, Maud Brault-Favrou, Jan Ove Bustnes, Paco Bustamante, Jóhannis Danielsen, Sébastien Descamps, Rune Dietz, Kjell Einar Erikstad, Igor Eulaers, Alexey Ezhov, Abram B Fleishman, Geir W Gabrielsen, Maria Gavrilo, Grant Gilchrist, Olivier Gilg, Sindri Gíslason, Elena Golubova, Aurélie Goutte, David Grémillet, Gunnar T Hallgrimsson, Erpur S Hansen, Sveinn Are Hanssen, Scott Hatch, Nicholas P Huffeldt, Dariusz Jakubas, Jón Einar Jónsson, Alexander S Kitaysky, Yann Kolbeinsson, Yuri Krasnov, Robert J Letcher, Jannie F Linnebjerg, Mark Mallory, Flemming Ravn Merkel, Børge Moe, William J Montevecchi, Anders Mosbech, Bergur Olsen, Rachael A Orben, Jennifer F Provencher, Sunna B Ragnarsdottir, Tone K Reiertsen, Nora Rojek, Marc Romano, Jens Søndergaard, Hallvard Strøm, Akinori Takahashi, Sabrina Tartu, Thorkell L Thórarinsson, Jean-Baptiste Thiebot, Alexis P Will, Simon Wilson, Katarzyna Wojczulanis-Jakubas, Glenn Yannic |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 4 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Denmark | 1 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 34 | 65% |
| Scientists | 15 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 15% |
| Researcher | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 30 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 15% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 36 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#841,073
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#1,107
of 30,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,171
of 446,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#49
of 923 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 923 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.