↓ Skip to main content

The impact of PICU physician staffing on patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of PICU physician staffing on patient outcomes
Published in
Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, January 2016
DOI 10.3918/jsicm.23.301
Authors

Naoki Fujiwara, Yusuke Seino, Yuki Yasaka, Yumiko Seki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2022.
All research outputs
#15,745,282
of 25,707,225 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#76
of 145 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,743
of 401,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,707,225 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 145 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.