↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dynamic response of C‐type natriuretic peptide and its aminoterminal propeptide (NTproCNP) to growth hormone treatment in children with short stature
Published in
Clinical Endocrinology, June 2016
DOI 10.1111/cen.13103
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP) and its aminoterminal propeptide (NTproCNP) are potential biomarkers of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) efficacy. The objective of this study was to describe the pharmacodynamics of plasma CNP and NTproCNP levels in response to rhGH treatment and to identify the optimal time of sampling after starting rhGH. This was a prospective, observational study. Subjects were treated with rhGH for one year, with blood sampled at regular intervals. Eighteen prepubertal children, eight with low levels of GH on biochemical testing and ten with idiopathic short stature, completed the study. Blood levels of CNP, NTproCNP, GH, insulin-like growth factor-I, leptin, and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were measured. Anthropometrics were obtained. Plasma levels of both CNP and NTproCNP reached peak levels 7 to 28 days after starting rhGH treatment and then declined to intermediate levels through the first year. Plasma NTproCNP levels after 14 days trended towards a correlation with height velocity after 6 and 12 months of treatment. Unexpectedly, serum GH levels measured 2 and 28 days after starting rhGH correlated strongly with height velocity after 6 and 12 months of treatment. This study identified 14 days after starting rhGH treatment as the optimal time for assessing CNP and NTproCNP levels as biomarkers of rhGH efficacy. Additionally we identified GH levels as a potential biomarker. Larger, prospective studies are now needed to test the clinical utility of these biomarkers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 17%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 11%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Psychology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,167,415
of 24,484,013 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Endocrinology
#930
of 2,915 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,773
of 333,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Endocrinology
#9
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,484,013 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,915 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.