↓ Skip to main content

Pembrolizumab Therapy Triggering an Exacerbation of Preexisting Autoimmune Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pembrolizumab Therapy Triggering an Exacerbation of Preexisting Autoimmune Disease
Published in
Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports, October 2016
DOI 10.1177/2324709616674316
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Historically, metastatic melanoma was uniformly and rapidly lethal, and treatment options were limited. In recent years, however, checkpoint inhibitors have emerged as an accepted standard treatment for patients with advanced melanoma. In clinical trials, these agents have been largely well tolerated and have the potential to result in durable responses. Importantly though, one must recognize the unique side effect profile of these therapies, which can trigger or exacerbate underlying autoimmune disease. Whether this autoimmune activation is associated with a clinical response to therapy has been debated, and while not definitive, there is evidence in the literature of a possible association. The 2 cases presented describe this autoimmune phenomenon, along with a review of the existing literature on the relationship between response to immunotherapy and autoimmune side effects.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
France 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 14%
Other 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 21 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 26 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,751,449
of 26,841,878 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports
#268
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,962
of 312,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Investigative Medicine High Impact Case Reports
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,841,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.