↓ Skip to main content

Dinesha Samararatne, Review of Philipp Dann, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bonnemann, eds., The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dinesha Samararatne, Review of Philipp Dann, Michael Riegner, and Maxim Bonnemann, eds., The Global South and Comparative Constitutional Law
Published in
International Journal of Constitutional Law, June 2022
DOI 10.1093/icon/moac031
Authors

Dinesha Samararatne

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2022.
All research outputs
#5,378,703
of 25,551,063 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#261
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,347
of 432,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Constitutional Law
#12
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,551,063 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.