↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patterns of Neural Connectivity During an Attention Bias Task Moderate Associations Between Early Childhood Temperament and Internalizing Symptoms in Young Adulthood
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, March 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.01.036
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Biased attention to threat is found in both individuals with anxiety symptoms and children with the childhood temperament of behavioral inhibition (BI). Although perturbed fronto-amygdala function is implicated in biased attention among anxious individuals, no work has examined the neural correlates of attention biases in BI. Work in this area might clarify underlying mechanisms for anxiety in a sample at risk for internalizing disorders. We examined the relations among early childhood BI, fronto-amygdala connectivity during an attention bias task in young adulthood, and internalizing symptoms, assessed in young adulthood.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Israel 1 <1%
Unknown 154 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Researcher 25 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 12%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 83 53%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2013.
All research outputs
#15,846,913
of 26,505,350 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#4,822
of 6,735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,336
of 211,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#57
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,505,350 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.