↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Molecular Profiling of Aromatase Inhibitor–Treated Postmenopausal Breast Tumors Identifies Immune-Related Correlates of Resistance
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, May 2013
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-12-1000
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Estrogen withdrawal by treatment with aromatase inhibitors is the most effective form of endocrine therapy for postmenopausal estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, response to therapy varies markedly and understanding of the precise molecular effects of aromatase inhibitors and causes of resistance is limited. We aimed to identify in clinical breast cancer those genes and pathways most associated with resistance to aromatase inhibitors by examining the global transcriptional effects of AI treatment.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 112 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Other 11 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Student > Master 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Mathematics 2 2%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 34 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,666,882
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#6,817
of 12,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,932
of 195,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#84
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,861 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.