↓ Skip to main content

Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
33 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
5 Facebook pages
reddit
7 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
183 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bed bugs evolved unique adaptive strategy to resist pyrethroid insecticides
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01456
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent advances in genomic and post-genomic technologies have facilitated a genome-wide analysis of the insecticide resistance-associated genes in insects. Through bed bug, Cimex lectularius transcriptome analysis, we identified 14 molecular markers associated with pyrethroid resistance. Our studies revealed that most of the resistance-associated genes functioning in diverse mechanisms are expressed in the epidermal layer of the integument, which could prevent or slow down the toxin from reaching the target sites on nerve cells, where an additional layer of resistance (kdr) is possible. This strategy evolved in bed bugs is based on their unique morphological, physiological and behavioral characteristics and has not been reported in any other insect species. RNA interference-aided knockdown of resistance associated genes showed the relative contribution of each mechanism towards overall resistance development. Understanding the complexity of adaptive strategies employed by bed bugs will help in designing the most effective and sustainable bed bug control methods.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 183 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Slovenia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 176 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Other 9 5%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 93 51%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 7%
Environmental Science 7 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 39 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2026.
All research outputs
#223,917
of 33,928,890 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,661
of 181,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,164
of 241,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#9
of 527 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,928,890 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 181,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 527 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.