↓ Skip to main content

Histological features of Clostridioides difficile colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Overview of attention for article published in Histopathology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Histological features of Clostridioides difficile colitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease
Published in
Histopathology, July 2022
DOI 10.1111/his.14702
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at increased risk for Clostridioides difficile infection, although clinically important infections can be difficult to recognize. C. difficile infection does not produce pseudomembranes when it occurs in IBD patients. These individuals may also be colonized by the organism, in which case diarrheal symptoms are not necessarily attributed to C. difficile. We performed this study to determine whether any features distinguished C. difficile-associated colitis from an IBD flare. We reviewed the clinical, endoscopic, and biopsy findings from 50 patients with established IBD and worsening diarrhea, including 22 with concurrent positive C. difficile stool toxin PCR assays and 28 with negative C. difficile assay results. We found that C. difficile infected patients had symptoms and endoscopic findings that were indistinguishable from active IBD. Although most biopsy samples from patients with C. difficile infection showed chronic active colitis indistinguishable from IBD, some displayed neutrophilic infiltrates unaccompanied by plasma cell-rich inflammation involving superficial (41%) and crypt (18%) epithelium as well as neutrophilic infiltrates within lamina propria distant from foci of cryptitis (32%). All three of these features were significantly more common among infected than uninfected patients (4%, 0%, and 4%; p=0.002, p=0.03, and p=0.02, respectively). Although colonic biopsies from IBD patients with C. difficile infection usually lack features that aid distinction from colitic flares, some cases show an acute colitis pattern not seen in IBD alone. When identified in biopsies from symptomatic IBD patients, these changes should alert pathologists to the possibility of this clinically important infection.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 22%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,870,484
of 26,855,855 outputs
Outputs from Histopathology
#1,108
of 3,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,983
of 443,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histopathology
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,855,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.