↓ Skip to main content

Multicenter and Multichannel Pooling GCN for Early AD Diagnosis Based on Dual-Modality Fused Brain Network

Overview of attention for article published in IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multicenter and Multichannel Pooling GCN for Early AD Diagnosis Based on Dual-Modality Fused Brain Network
Published in
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, February 2023
DOI 10.1109/tmi.2022.3187141
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuegang Song, Feng Zhou, Alejandro F. Frangi, Jiuwen Cao, Xiaohua Xiao, Yi Lei, Tianfu Wang, Baiying Lei

Abstract

For significant memory concern (SMC) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI), their classification performance is limited by confounding features, diverse imaging protocols, and limited sample size. To address the above limitations, we introduce a dual-modality fused brain connectivity network combining resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), and propose three mechanisms in the current graph convolutional network (GCN) to improve classifier performance. First, we introduce a DTI-strength penalty term for constructing functional connectivity networks. Stronger structural connectivity and bigger structural strength diversity between groups provide a higher opportunity for retaining connectivity information. Second, a multi-center attention graph with each node representing a subject is proposed to consider the influence of data source, gender, acquisition equipment, and disease status of those training samples in GCN. The attention mechanism captures their different impacts on edge weights. Third, we propose a multi-channel mechanism to improve filter performance, assigning different filters to features based on feature statistics. Applying those nodes with low-quality features to perform convolution would also deteriorate filter performance. Therefore, we further propose a pooling mechanism, which introduces the disease status information of those training samples to evaluate the quality of nodes. Finally, we obtain the final classification results by inputting the multi-center attention graph into the multi-channel pooling GCN. The proposed method is tested on three datasets (i.e., an ADNI 2 dataset, an ADNI 3 dataset, and an in-house dataset). Experimental results indicate that the proposed method is effective and superior to other related algorithms, with a mean classification accuracy of 93.05% in our binary classification tasks. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Xuegang-S.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Unspecified 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 10 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 14%
Engineering 3 14%
Computer Science 2 9%
Mathematics 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 10 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#3,346,176
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#260
of 3,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,922
of 471,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
#2
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,747 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.