↓ Skip to main content

健康づくりのための身体活動指針の認知・知識・信念・行動意図の現状と身体活動・座位行動の関連

Overview of attention for article published in [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
健康づくりのための身体活動指針の認知・知識・信念・行動意図の現状と身体活動・座位行動の関連
Published in
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, June 2022
DOI 10.11236/jph.21-150
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takayuki Tajima, Kazuhiro Harada, Yuko Oguma, Susumu S Sawada

Abstract

Objective This study clarified the current status of awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions regarding the Japanese physical activity guidelines (Active Guide) and their relationship with physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the participants' characteristics.Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted with 7,000 participants aged 20-69 years registered with an online survey company. Awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions regarding the Active Guide were examined. Awareness was assessed by unprompted and prompted recall. Knowledge was assessed by numerical responses to "the recommended daily activity time (18-64 years/65 years and older)" and "physical activity time to be increased (plus-ten)," respectively. To survey the beliefs and behavioral intentions, we created a 5-point scale for the Active Guide. For physical activity, the amount of moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity was calculated from the Japan Public Health Center-based prospective Study (JPHC study) questionnaire. Physical activity level was calculated from the standard specific medical checkup and health guidance questionnaire. For sedentary behavior, the Japanese version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) was used. The dependent variables were awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions. The independent variables were physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the participants' characteristics (gender, age, body mass index, marital status, educational background, work status, and household income). After descriptive statistics were measured, a logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the associations.Results Unprompted and prompted recall of the Active Guide were 1.7% and 5.3-13.4%, respectively. Those with knowledge of it scored 37.2%, 7.0%, 24.8%, and 2.6% for recommended daily activity time (18-64 years), daily physical activity time (65 years and older), plus-ten, and all three items answered correctly, respectively. The median (interquartile range) score of the beliefs was 21 (16-25) points (32-point scale). Those with behavioral intentions scored 51.4% for "recommended daily activity" and 66.9% for "plus-ten." Logistic regression analysis showed that awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions were positively associated with moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity and level. The results were inconsistent for sedentary behavior. Although personal characteristics differed based on assessment item, they were mainly associated with age, education level, employment, and household income.Conclusions This study revealed that the number of people who had awareness and knowledge of the Active Guide remained low. Those with awareness, knowledge, beliefs, and behavioral intentions were more physically active. However, the results for sedentary behavior were not consistent. Hence, further research is required to understand this tendency. A future longitudinal study is also required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,485,623
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#98
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#201,581
of 443,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.