↓ Skip to main content

Handheld Ultrasound Versus Physical Examination in Patients Referred for Transthoracic Echocardiography for a Suspected Cardiac Condition

Overview of attention for article published in JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
113 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Handheld Ultrasound Versus Physical Examination in Patients Referred for Transthoracic Echocardiography for a Suspected Cardiac Condition
Published in
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, September 2014
DOI 10.1016/j.jcmg.2014.05.011
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 15%
Student > Postgraduate 12 11%
Other 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Master 10 9%
Other 30 27%
Unknown 20 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 56%
Engineering 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 25 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#553,003
of 34,199,106 outputs
Outputs from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#91
of 3,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,448
of 291,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
#1
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,199,106 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,223 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,848 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.