↓ Skip to main content

Noncovalent Ubiquitin Interactions Regulate the Catalytic Activity of Ubiquitin Writers

Overview of attention for article published in Trends in Biochemical Sciences, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Noncovalent Ubiquitin Interactions Regulate the Catalytic Activity of Ubiquitin Writers
Published in
Trends in Biochemical Sciences, September 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.tibs.2016.08.003
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Covalent modification of substrate proteins with ubiquitin is the end result of an intricate network of protein-protein interactions. The inherent ability of the E1, E2, and E3 proteins of the ubiquitylation cascade (the ubiquitin writers) to interact with ubiquitin facilitates this process. Importantly, contact between ubiquitin and the E2/E3 writers is required for catalysis and the assembly of chains of a given linkage. However, ubiquitin is also an activator of ubiquitin-writing enzymes, with many recent studies highlighting the ability of ubiquitin to regulate activity and substrate modification. Here, we review the interactions between ubiquitin-writing enzymes and regulatory ubiquitin molecules that promote activity, and highlight the potential of these interactions to promote processive ubiquitin transfer.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 17 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 20%
Chemistry 4 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2017.
All research outputs
#16,344,768
of 27,781,301 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#2,335
of 2,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,095
of 315,564 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Biochemical Sciences
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,781,301 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,831 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,564 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.