↓ Skip to main content

3‐D imaging, illustration, and quantitation of enteric glial network in transparent human colon mucosa

Overview of attention for article published in Neurogastroenterology & Motility, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
3‐D imaging, illustration, and quantitation of enteric glial network in transparent human colon mucosa
Published in
Neurogastroenterology & Motility, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/nmo.12115
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Enteric glia form a network in the intestinal mucosa and have been suggested to engage in multidirectional interactions with the epithelium, blood vessels, nerves, and immune system. However, due to the dispersed nature of the glial network, standard histology cannot provide a global view of the network architecture. We prepared transparent human colon mucosa for three-dimensional (3-D) confocal microscopy with S100B immunostaining to reveal the location-dependent glial network for qualitative and quantitative analyses.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 66 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 16 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 18%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 7%
Neuroscience 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2015.
All research outputs
#19,402,050
of 24,712,008 outputs
Outputs from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#1,655
of 2,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,079
of 221,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurogastroenterology & Motility
#17
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,712,008 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.