↓ Skip to main content

Message Framing and Medium Considerations for Recruiting Newly Eligible Teen Organ Donor Registrants

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Transplantation, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Message Framing and Medium Considerations for Recruiting Newly Eligible Teen Organ Donor Registrants
Published in
American Journal of Transplantation, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04010.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In response to the current organ shortage-and in an effort to increase the number of registered donors-the present campaign employed a direct-mail marketing strategy that registered 6908 individuals in the state's First-Person Consent Registry (FPCR). In evaluating the most effective of three mailers, 18-year-old individuals (N = 139,356) were randomly assigned to receive: (a) a letter from the Secretary of State (SoS); (b) a brochure from the SoS or (c) both. As hypothesized, the results revealed that exposure to the SoS letter only resulted in a greater registration rate than exposure to the SoS brochure only. Results also revealed that exposure to both the SoS letter and SoS brochure resulted in a greater registration rate than exposure to the SoS brochure only. No difference in registration rate emerged between exposure to the SoS letter and SoS brochure compared to exposure to the SoS letter only. Our results speak to the effectiveness of utilizing personalized direct-mail marketing strategies to promote organ donation with an emphasis on the practical implications of our findings for organ donation practitioners.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Lecturer 2 11%
Librarian 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 21%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 11%
Philosophy 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2013.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Transplantation
#3,329
of 5,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,283
of 169,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Transplantation
#41
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,058 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,059 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.