↓ Skip to main content

Residential Radon and Risk of Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiology, March 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
13 X users
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Residential Radon and Risk of Lung Cancer
Published in
Epidemiology, March 2005
DOI 10.1097/01.ede.0000152522.80261.e3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Underground miners exposed to high levels of radon have an excess risk of lung cancer. Residential exposure to radon is at much lower levels, and the risk of lung cancer with residential exposure is less clear. We conducted a systematic analysis of pooled data from all North American residential radon studies.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 15%
Student > Master 19 12%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 63 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Environmental Science 17 10%
Physics and Astronomy 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 69 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2025.
All research outputs
#1,780,516
of 33,732,945 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiology
#413
of 3,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,768
of 103,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,732,945 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,837 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.