You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
新型コロナウイルス感染症蔓延による都道府県民健康・栄養調査への影響:日本公衆衛生学会公衆衛生モニタリング・レポート委員会報告
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
[Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.11236/jph.22-020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Akiko Kubo, Kazue Kuno, Koutatsu Maruyama, Rumi Tsukinoki, Hiroyuki Noda, Ken'ichi Egawa, Izumi Shibuya, Masako Sei, Mieko Chihara, Kazue Nishina, Hiroshi Yatsuya |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,637,892
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#155
of 457 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,319
of 443,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from [Nippon kōshū eisei zasshi] Japanese journal of public health
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 457 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.