↓ Skip to main content

沖縄島および屋久島から得られた日本初記録のAntennarius biocellatusピエロカエルアンコウ(新称)

Overview of attention for article published in Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
沖縄島および屋久島から得られた日本初記録のAntennarius biocellatusピエロカエルアンコウ(新称)
Published in
Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan, July 2022
DOI 10.34583/ichthy.22.0_9
Authors

宮本 圭, 和田 英敏, 長坂 忠之助, 髙野 はるか, 本村 浩之, 瀬能 宏

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,215,817
of 25,852,155 outputs
Outputs from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#37
of 97 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,545
of 439,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ichthy, Natural History of Fishes of Japan
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,852,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.