↓ Skip to main content

Mediators of the effect of neighborhood poverty on physical functioning among breast cancer survivors: a longitudinal study

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Causes & Control, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mediators of the effect of neighborhood poverty on physical functioning among breast cancer survivors: a longitudinal study
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10552-012-0030-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Female breast cancer survivors, a large and growing population, experience impaired physical functioning after treatment. Survivors living in impoverished neighborhoods may suffer even greater impairment, but the mechanisms linking neighborhood poverty and individual outcomes are poorly understood. This study sought to identify mediators of the effect of neighborhood poverty on physical functioning using longitudinal data from a Missouri cancer registry-based sample of 909 female breast cancer survivors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 142 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 17%
Unknown 41 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 19%
Psychology 27 19%
Social Sciences 12 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 47 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#11,075,031
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Causes & Control
#1,225
of 2,681 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,191
of 210,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Causes & Control
#13
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,681 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.