↓ Skip to main content

Sacrifice to the wind gods in late Shang China – religious, paleographic, linguistic and philological analyses: An integrated approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sacrifice to the wind gods in late Shang China – religious, paleographic, linguistic and philological analyses: An integrated approach
Published in
Journal of Chinese Writing Systems, July 2022
DOI 10.1177/25138502211063232
Authors

Fa Li, Ken-ichi Takashima

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2026.
All research outputs
#7,720,384
of 26,383,519 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chinese Writing Systems
#5
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,455
of 442,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chinese Writing Systems
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,519 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one scored the same or higher as 32 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them