↓ Skip to main content

Application of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Method of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery.

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
254 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Application of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Method of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery.
Published in
Current Pharmaceutical Design, January 2017
DOI 10.2174/1381612822666161026162707
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is an emerging manufacturing technology for biomedical and pharmaceutical applications. Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is a low cost extrusion-based 3D printing technique that can deposit materials layer-by-layer to create solid geometries. This review article aims to provide an overview of FDM based 3D printing application in developing new drug delivery systems. The principle methodology, suitable polymers and important parameters in FDM technology and its applications in fabrication of personalised tablets and drug delivery devices are discussed in this review. FDM based 3D printing is a novel and versatile manufacturing technique for creating customised drug delivery devices that contain accurate dose of medicine(s) and provide controlled drug released profiles.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 254 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 11%
Student > Master 28 11%
Researcher 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 99 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 52 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 44 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 6%
Materials Science 10 4%
Chemistry 7 3%
Other 16 6%
Unknown 111 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#31,228,352
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#3,917
of 4,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#409,497
of 462,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pharmaceutical Design
#195
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,565 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.