↓ Skip to main content

Congruification: support for time scaling large phylogenetic trees

Overview of attention for article published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
151 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Congruification: support for time scaling large phylogenetic trees
Published in
Methods in Ecology and Evolution, April 2013
DOI 10.1111/2041-210x.12051
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 151 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Netherlands 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Germany 2 1%
Chile 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 131 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 43 28%
Researcher 34 23%
Student > Master 18 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 13 9%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 67%
Environmental Science 18 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 7%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 1%
Mathematics 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 18 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2014.
All research outputs
#2,125,508
of 28,832,041 outputs
Outputs from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#800
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,001
of 212,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in Ecology and Evolution
#5
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,832,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.