↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical properties of nanosheets and nanotubes investigated using a new geometry independent volume definition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanical properties of nanosheets and nanotubes investigated using a new geometry independent volume definition
Published in
Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, March 2013
DOI 10.1088/0953-8984/25/15/155302
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cross-sectional area and volume become difficult to define as material dimensions approach the atomic scale. This limits the transferability of macroscopic concepts such as Young's modulus. We propose a new volume definition where the enclosed nanosheet or nanotube average electron density matches that of the parent layered bulk material. We calculate the Young's moduli for various nanosheets (including graphene, BN and MoS2) and nanotubes. Further implications of this new volume definition such as a Fermi level dependent Young's modulus and out-of-plane Poisson's ratio are shown.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
India 1 3%
China 1 3%
Unknown 37 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 9 23%
Materials Science 9 23%
Engineering 8 20%
Chemistry 3 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 8 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#5,364,143
of 29,139,670 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#229
of 6,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,680
of 219,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter
#1
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,139,670 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,237 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 219,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.