↓ Skip to main content

Trunk motion and gait characteristics of pregnant women when walking: report of a longitudinal study with a control group

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
137 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Trunk motion and gait characteristics of pregnant women when walking: report of a longitudinal study with a control group
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-71
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A longitudinal repeated measures design over pregnancy and post-birth, with a control group would provide insight into the mechanical adaptations of the body under conditions of changing load during a common female human lifespan condition, while minimizing the influences of inter human differences. The objective was to investigate systematic changes in the range of motion for the pelvic and thoracic segments of the spine, the motion between these segments (thoracolumbar spine) and temporospatial characteristics of step width, stride length and velocity during walking as pregnancy progresses and post-birth.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Malta 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 134 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 16%
Student > Master 19 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 12%
Researcher 9 7%
Professor 8 6%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 43 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 18%
Engineering 15 11%
Sports and Recreations 15 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 56 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#14,102,908
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,600
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,555
of 199,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#49
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.