↓ Skip to main content

Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football

Overview of attention for article published in Human Movement Science, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Individual differences in the visual control of intercepting a penalty kick in association football
Published in
Human Movement Science, March 2010
DOI 10.1016/j.humov.2010.02.008
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent perceptual-motor studies have revealed variations in learning trajectories of novices. Despite such observation, relatively little attention has been paid to studying individual differences in experienced performers' perceptual-motor behaviors. The present study examined individual differences for a visual anticipation task. Experienced association football goalkeepers attempted to intercept penalty kicks taken with deceptive and non-deceptive kicking actions. Data revealed that differences in the action capabilities of goalkeepers affected the timing and accuracy of movement response behaviors. Faster goalkeepers tended to wait until later before initiating movement in comparison with slower goalkeepers. The study of affordances in sport environments offers a theoretical framework with which to overcome some of the reported methodological limitations in the visual anticipation literature.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Portugal 3 1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 234 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 18%
Student > Bachelor 41 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 14%
Researcher 20 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 6%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 56 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 84 34%
Psychology 39 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 4%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Other 32 13%
Unknown 62 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,414,546
of 29,485,101 outputs
Outputs from Human Movement Science
#170
of 1,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,104
of 118,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Movement Science
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,485,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.