↓ Skip to main content

Brain Areas Controlling Heart Rate Variability in Tinnitus and Tinnitus-Related Distress

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Brain Areas Controlling Heart Rate Variability in Tinnitus and Tinnitus-Related Distress
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0059728
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Tinnitus is defined as an intrinsic sound perception that cannot be attributed to an external sound source. Distress in tinnitus patients is related to increased beta activity in the dorsal part of the anterior cingulate and the amount of distress correlates with network activity consisting of the amygdala-anterior cingulate cortex-insula-parahippocampus. Previous research also revealed that distress is associated to a higher sympathetic (OS) tone in tinnitus patients and tinnitus suppression to increased parasympathetic (PS) tone.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Trinidad and Tobago 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 101 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 15%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Professor 8 8%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 20%
Psychology 17 16%
Neuroscience 17 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Engineering 5 5%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2013.
All research outputs
#22,343,751
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#134,602
of 224,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,460
of 245,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,555
of 5,776 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,776 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.