To demonstrate the feasibility, safety, and effectiveness of image-guided sclerotherapy of low-flow vascular malformations using a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR scanner with real-time imaging capability and in-suite fluoroscopy.
Thirty-three procedures were performed with real-time 1.5T MR-guidance on 22 patients with a vascular malformation in the neck (n = 2), chest (n = 6), abdomen and pelvis (n = 15), and extremities (n = 11). Quantitative analysis was performed for changes in (a) planning time, (b) targeting time (interval between needle skin puncture and lesion access), (c) intervention time (interval between needle skin puncture and needle removal), and (d) total procedure time. Qualitative analysis was performed for (a) success of therapy and (b) occurrence of complications.
Technical success was achieved in 29 of 33 procedures. The average planning time did not significantly change between the first seven procedures and the last seven procedures (P = 0.447). The average targeting time decreased by 0:24:45 (hours:minutes:seconds) (P = 0.043), the average intervention time decreased by 0:26:58 (P = 0.022), and the average procedure time decreased by 0:28:41 (P = 0.046) when comparing the first seven procedures and the last seven procedures. Overall, there was an improvement in the patients' predominant symptoms following 82% of procedures, including a significant decrease in average pain following therapy (P < 0.001). There was a minor complication rate of 3% with no major complications.
MR-guided percutaneous sclerotherapy seems to be a safe, effective, and versatile technique for treating low-flow vascular malformations.
3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#2,828
of 3,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,281
of 317,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
#22
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
