↓ Skip to main content

Transverse changes determined by rapid and slow maxillary expansion – a low‐dose CT‐based randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transverse changes determined by rapid and slow maxillary expansion – a low‐dose CT‐based randomized controlled trial
Published in
Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, March 2012
DOI 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2012.01543.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To compare transverse skeletal changes produced by rapid (RME) and slow (SME) maxillary expansion using low-dose computed tomography. The null hypothesis was that SME and RME are equally effective in producing skeletal maxillary expansion in patients with posterior crossbite.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 5%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 64 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Chemical Engineering 1 <1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 72 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,115,240
of 27,356,215 outputs
Outputs from Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
#60
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,216
of 177,701 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,356,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,701 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.