↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Adolescent Girls With Anorexia Nervosa Have Impaired Cortical and Trabecular Microarchitecture and Lower Estimated Bone Strength at the Distal Radius
Published in
JCEM, March 2013
DOI 10.1210/jc.2012-4153
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN) have low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at both cortical and trabecular sites, and recent data show impaired trabecular microarchitecture independent of aBMD. However, data are lacking regarding both cortical microarchitecture and bone strength assessment by finite element analysis (FEA) in adolescents with AN. Because microarchitectural abnormalities and FEA may predict fracture risk independent of aBMD, these data are important to obtain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 98 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Researcher 7 7%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 28 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 8%
Engineering 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 35 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#11,546,840
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from JCEM
#10,598
of 21,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,016
of 261,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JCEM
#141
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.