↓ Skip to main content

Compression as a Universal Principle of Animal Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Cognitive Science, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
2 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Compression as a Universal Principle of Animal Behavior
Published in
Cognitive Science, July 2013
DOI 10.1111/cogs.12061
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A key aim in biology and psychology is to identify fundamental principles underpinning the behavior of animals, including humans. Analyses of human language and the behavior of a range of non-human animal species have provided evidence for a common pattern underlying diverse behavioral phenomena: Words follow Zipf's law of brevity (the tendency of more frequently used words to be shorter), and conformity to this general pattern has been seen in the behavior of a number of other animals. It has been argued that the presence of this law is a sign of efficient coding in the information theoretic sense. However, no strong direct connection has been demonstrated between the law and compression, the information theoretic principle of minimizing the expected length of a code. Here, we show that minimizing the expected code length implies that the length of a word cannot increase as its frequency increases. Furthermore, we show that the mean code length or duration is significantly small in human language, and also in the behavior of other species in all cases where agreement with the law of brevity has been found. We argue that compression is a general principle of animal behavior that reflects selection for efficiency of coding.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Netherlands 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 11%
Professor 11 11%
Student > Master 8 8%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 23%
Psychology 18 19%
Linguistics 9 9%
Computer Science 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 22 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2024.
All research outputs
#5,827,254
of 32,030,936 outputs
Outputs from Cognitive Science
#453
of 1,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,431
of 231,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cognitive Science
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,030,936 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,718 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.