↓ Skip to main content

Mental health nurses in primary care: Qualitative outcomes of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mental health nurses in primary care: Qualitative outcomes of the Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, March 2013
DOI 10.1111/inm.12017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The Mental Health Nurse Incentive Program (MHNIP) is a government-funded programme, which, since 2007, has enabled mental health nurses to work in primary care settings in Australia in collaboration with general practitioners (GPs) or private psychiatrists. To date, small-scale qualitative studies have explored outcomes of the programme from the point of view of nurses, consumers, and the perceptions of GPs. This study reports on an on-line survey of credentialed mental health nurses perceptions of outcomes of the MHNIP. Two hundred and twenty five nurses who worked in MHNIP provided detailed narrative responses that were examined using thematic content analysis. The most commonly-cited outcomes were reductions in symptoms or improved coping, improved relationships, and enhanced community participation. Other reported outcomes included reduced hospitalization or use of state-funded mental health services, better use of health services, the continuation or establishment of meaningful occupation, improved physical health and medication management, less use of coercive interventions, and greater independence.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 10%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 23 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 24%
Psychology 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2018.
All research outputs
#3,677,570
of 29,820,216 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#494
of 1,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,810
of 221,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Nursing
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,820,216 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,045 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.