You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tephrochronological study on the long-term activity of Tachikawa fault, Tokyo metropolitan area, central Japan
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu), January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.4116/jaqua.47.103 |
| Authors |
Takehiko Suzuki, Masanori Murata, Masayuki Oishi, Haruo Yamazaki, Toshio Nakayama, Shinichi Kawashima, Masafumi Kawai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 3 | 60% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2013.
All research outputs
#14,278,325
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#146
of 215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,701
of 168,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Quaternary Research (Daiyonki-Kenkyu)
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 215 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.