↓ Skip to main content

Extreme sports are good for your health: A phenomenological understanding of fear and anxiety in extreme sport

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health Psychology, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
256 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Extreme sports are good for your health: A phenomenological understanding of fear and anxiety in extreme sport
Published in
Journal of Health Psychology, June 2012
DOI 10.1177/1359105312446770
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Extreme sports are traditionally explored from a risk-taking perspective which often assumes that participants do not experience fear. In this article we explore participants' experience of fear associated with participation in extreme sports. An interpretive phenomenological method was used with 15 participants. Four themes emerged: experience of fear, relationship to fear, management of fear, and fear and self-transformation. Participants' experience of extreme sports was revealed in terms of intense fear but this fear was integrated and experienced as a potentially meaningful and constructive event in their lives. The findings have implications for understanding fear as a potentially transformative process.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 249 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 47 18%
Student > Master 34 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Student > Postgraduate 14 5%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 74 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 52 20%
Psychology 47 18%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Arts and Humanities 12 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 4%
Other 39 15%
Unknown 77 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2026.
All research outputs
#637,121
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health Psychology
#97
of 2,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,756
of 218,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health Psychology
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,449 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 218,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.