↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 1,519)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
25 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Impact of 10-Day Fulbright Specialist Program and Project Pink Blue Education Sessions on Medical Oncology Knowledge Among Physicians Who Treat Cancer in Nigeria
Published in
Journal of Cancer Education, July 2022
DOI 10.1007/s13187-021-02130-y
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite an estimated population of over 201 million and over 115,950 yearly diagnosed new cases of cancer, Nigeria does not have dedicated medical oncologists. Most oncology care is delivered through surgical and clinical oncologists, who are trained in both radiation and medical oncology and they number fewer than 50 in the country. With a limited number of oncology professionals, cancer patients in Nigeria experience poor health outcomes, with an estimated cancer mortality rate of 75,000 deaths per year. Participants from 15 Nigerian states were selected to attend the medical oncology training. Through the support of Fulbright Specialist Program and Project PINK BLUE, two of the authors delivered 10 days of lectures based on ASCO, ESMO, and NCCN guidelines. Mean scores of both the pre- and post-course tests as well as a 1-year follow-up test were compared using GraphPad Prism 7.0a by paired t-tests. Forty-four clinical oncologists were selected for participation. Twenty-five (57%) completed the pre- and post-course tests. Of the 25 that completed both tests, percentage of correct answers increased from 45 to 59% (2-sided p-value < 0.0001). Improvements were seen in attending doctors 45 to 59% (p = 0.0046) and resident doctors 45 to 59% (0.0007). Eleven doctors responded to the 1-year follow-up test. Although not statistically significant, a numerical pattern for the benefits was maintained 1 year after the program (45% pre-course versus 52% post-course correct answers, Fisher's exact, p = 0.4185). In the short term, the training improved medical oncology knowledge in Nigeria, regardless of the participant's carrier stage. Long-term benefits were not sustained in a small sample of participants, and continuing education strategies are necessary. Similar models may be employed across Africa.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,352,514
of 34,039,688 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Education
#44
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,954
of 462,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Education
#1
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,039,688 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.