↓ Skip to main content

Spontaneous synchronized tapping to an auditory rhythm in a chimpanzee

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spontaneous synchronized tapping to an auditory rhythm in a chimpanzee
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2013
DOI 10.1038/srep01566
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuko Hattori, Masaki Tomonaga, Tetsuro Matsuzawa

Abstract

Humans actively use behavioral synchrony such as dancing and singing when they intend to make affiliative relationships. Such advanced synchronous movement occurs even unconsciously when we hear rhythmically complex music. A foundation for this tendency may be an evolutionary adaptation for group living but evolutionary origins of human synchronous activity is unclear. Here we show the first evidence that a member of our closest living relatives, a chimpanzee, spontaneously synchronizes her movement with an auditory rhythm: After a training to tap illuminated keys on an electric keyboard, one chimpanzee spontaneously aligned her tapping with the sound when she heard an isochronous distractor sound. This result indicates that sensitivity to, and tendency toward synchronous movement with an auditory rhythm exist in chimpanzees, although humans may have expanded it to unique forms of auditory and visual communication during the course of human evolution.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 192 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 17%
Researcher 29 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 19 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 39 19%
Unknown 31 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 57 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Neuroscience 26 13%
Arts and Humanities 13 6%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 41 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2022.
All research outputs
#211,010
of 24,907,378 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#2,484
of 136,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,281
of 202,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#9
of 486 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,907,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,554 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 486 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.