↓ Skip to main content

Reasons of doctors for not granting a request for euthanasia: mixed-methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Reasons of doctors for not granting a request for euthanasia: mixed-methods study
Published in
BJGP Open, July 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2022.0015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caroline van den Ende, Eveline Margaretha Bunge, Jennifer Eeuwijk, Eveline Bunge, Suzanne van de Vathorst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,654,554
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#434
of 587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,028
of 426,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,190 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.