Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophy (DBMD) are allelic, X-linked recessive, neuromuscular disorders characterized by progressive loss of muscle function. Despite technological advances in diagnostic genetic testing, the mean age at diagnosis (4.7 years) has remained unchanged for decades. The purpose of the study was to characterize parental perceptions of the diagnostic process and identify factors that influence the timeline. Data collection for this qualitative study consisted of six individual and five group interviews. Participants (N = 30) included Hispanic, non-Hispanic black, and non-Hispanic white parents whose son was diagnosed with DBMD. The "help-seeking behavior model" provided an analytical framework to analyze the data. Parents did not move through help-seeking stages unidirectionally as described in other studies. Delays existed at each stage. We identified personal, familial, social, cultural, and provider factors that impeded earlier diagnosis. These barriers prolonged movement through a stage or led families to repeat previous stages. Results should initiate debate among system administrators, patient advocates, and healthcare providers regarding which barriers may be most modifiable and which interventions may reduce the time to diagnosis and limit parental emotional distress.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2013.
All research outputs
#28,639,288
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#3,458
of 4,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,131
of 243,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A
#59
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
